Kiel
Formerly WJ ZUK
Well after months a months of thinking about axles, for some reason I keep coming back to rockwell axles. Please convince me why not too after these points are made. I just hate the idea of spending 3k on a built dana 60 front not that a rockwell will end up much cheaper, but it would be stronger
Can be hub flipped down to 69 inches wms to wms
6.72 gears or whatever stock
Toploader
1.62 shafts upgradable to 2.0 for the same money to upgrade a 60
Can be found cheaper usually then front 60's, but is getting harder.
ability to run massive tires
easier brake and drive-line setups
downsides the I only see has partial reasons
Weigh more then a 60 about 150-200 more per axle
are wide at 69 inches but I was planning on full width anyway
part availabiltity, but how avail are built 60 parts anyway? Plus we have boyce!
Why don't we see any rockwells here in utah except for a chosen few. California and texas and most the south have huge numbers and they seem to be drifting northen aren't they?
Can be hub flipped down to 69 inches wms to wms
6.72 gears or whatever stock
Toploader
1.62 shafts upgradable to 2.0 for the same money to upgrade a 60
Can be found cheaper usually then front 60's, but is getting harder.
ability to run massive tires
easier brake and drive-line setups
downsides the I only see has partial reasons
Weigh more then a 60 about 150-200 more per axle
are wide at 69 inches but I was planning on full width anyway
part availabiltity, but how avail are built 60 parts anyway? Plus we have boyce!
Why don't we see any rockwells here in utah except for a chosen few. California and texas and most the south have huge numbers and they seem to be drifting northen aren't they?