My be a little bit of a hyjack, sorry.
I'm working on my 4400 car and really want to use the 44 in the front. HP f250 version.
Looking at the jana54 ring/pinion and rcv's with slugs. I know that it would be cheaper to buy a 60, but an extra 200 pounds of unsprung weight goes with it. Seems like a horrible thing to do to a car that will run through the woops.
From previous post it sounds like it may work ok for me considering the parlty 200 hp my motor makes. Any thoughts?
Your unsprung weight issue is noted. I had a discussion for a few days with a guy that had a LOT of experience desert racing. It would be interesting to hear some other folks' thoughts with similar experience (calling Garth or Neagle here). Basically his view was similar to yours. The penalty of the D60 was NOT worth it to him and he thought I was somewhat sane and wondered why it was worth it to me. We came to no conclusion but I decided the unsprung weight was mostly an ASSET while crawling (traction, weight VERY low in the chassis, etc.) but would become a detriment if I decided to go fast.
Running it through the whoops will punish anything. I'm curious WHAT would hold up to that. I don't think you'll stress the axle joints like you would crawling, but you WILL stress the axle joints with 4 wheel drifts at speed and whatnot. For what it's worth, my friend trussed the HELL out of his D44 fronts and ran them pretty hard with good results.
From what I know about D44, you've got the king version of that with the burly tubes and whatnot. I say I'd run it (you have it) and see what you get. Your weight penalty for the D60 is quite severe. I still think you'd need to truss a D60 for your use. At speed the leverage on that housing will be incredible. I don't think you'll have issues with the ring pinion as much as bending the housing and any associated issues that will create. The reverse D44 should be quite strong. Is the Jana 54 unit reverse?