spiderman said:Is the 10 bolt front gm axle really that much weaker than the dana 44? I know that they have the neck-down on the axle by the splines that they break at, but other than that, aren't they pretty close?
spencurai said:lets just say that if you already have the axle...think about it....if you are shopping for axles and think you wanna buy one...DON'T!!!
spiderman said:yeah, this is an axle I already have. I think I will run it and see how it goes. I just can't get much comparative info. between the two axles.
Greg said:Here's your real world comparitive info...
Back in the day (About '96-'97) Shannon Campbell had one of the first real 'Buggies.' I believe he was running a 350, Auto & ????- T-case with 2, GM 10 Bolt axles... spinning 35" Boggers. They worked very well for him and set him up as one of the Rock-buggy authorities.
Go for it! Build that 10 Bolt!
Shawn said:There is nothing wrong with a 10 bolt (depending on the application).
spiderman said:It's going under a zuk. It's all gm drivetrain. (buick motor, th350 trans, undecided t-case, ff 14 bolt rear). So there is some added weight up top, but not a whole lot. Main weight gain is from the anchor out back.
I agree totally. Not to mention the fact that full widths on a zuk is rediculous IMO.spencurai said:they are great axles but you gotta get em up in the air!! and if you are going to put LARGE tires on...that 10 bolt aint gonna hack!!
I agree totally. Not to mention the fact that full widths on a zuk is rediculous IMO.
Yeah, but running a 14 bolt in a Zuk kinda defeats the purpose of using a Zuk for the buildup. Use some waggy axles or Yota gear.spiderman said:To each his own. This is exactly why there is not just one kind of rig running around.
Hickey said:Yeah, but running a 14 bolt in a Zuk kinda defeats the purpose of using a Zuk for the buildup. Use some waggy axles or Yota gear.