• DCRC 2024

Hold onto your hats: executive order on the way...

Kiel

Kiel

Formerly WJ ZUK
Herzog telling me to sack up, the world must really be going down the shitter
 
Greg

Greg

Make RME Rockcrawling Again!
Admin
Location
Grand Junction, CO
Big Sarge just posted this on FB, I thought it was very interesting... -

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8806/c...ck-federal-gun-control/#.UO49-nPAnXF.facebook

President Obama has given his comic sidekick the task of pushing gun control measures through Congress. Democrats and some liberal Republicans are calling for more gun control after the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Some state and municipal politicians, like the #1 anti-gun person in the nation – New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, are also calling for more control.

But did you know that no matter what gun control laws are passed by the federal government, they can only be enforced in your area if your county sheriff allows them to be.

Most people, including politicians fail to realize that the ultimate legal authorities in the land are the county sheriffs. This was established from the time of the Founding Fathers and upheld by the US Supreme Court in the 1997 case of Printz v. United States. Initially, the case was Mack v. United States, but by the time it reached the Supreme Court it was renamed.

The case involved new federal regulations involved with the Brady Bill and gun control. FBI agents went around to the various county sheriffs and demanded that they follow the new federal guidelines. Then Graham County (AZ) Sheriff Richard Mack and several others saw the Brady Bill as being unconstitutional and refused to impose the new federal guidelines. Part of their defense was that the county sheriff was the supreme law enforcement officer over their county and that the federal government could not supersede their legal authority.

[T]he local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The Federalist, No. 39 at 245.

Scalia then referred to Gregory, 501 US at 458 when he wrote:

“This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty: ‘Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.’. . .”

Referring once again to President Madison, Scalia wrote:

“In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and then the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (P. 922).

In other words, the county sheriff is the highest governmental authority in his county and he does not have to bow to the tyranny of the federal government if he deems such actions to be unconstitutional or unlawful. In essence, the county sheriff has more legal authority within his county than the governor or the state or even the president of the United States.

Today, former Sheriff Richard Mack works with a number of county sheriffs throughout the county, helping them understand the extent of their authority and how they can legally defy the federal government. I would highly recommend that you contact your county sheriff and see if he/she is aware of their powers and duties. If not, get them in contact with Mack and urge your county sheriff to stand up against upcoming unconstitutional gun laws that the liberals are going to try to impose on us.
Click to expand...
 
Spork

Spork

Tin Foil Hat Equipped
Location
Saratoga Springs, UT
Stephen said:
Chief Burbank here in SLC doesn't enforce half the laws on the books anyway, so it makes sense. (Chances are he'd enforce any anti-gun law, though).
Click to expand...

:spork::spork: My tinfoil is tingling... Could it be what the government wants? Put enough laws out there so that anyone you desire is breaking the law. Sidewalks not shoveled, lawn not mowed, gun without 6 US made parts, tires not covered, pets unsupervised, children running wild, modifications to your house without the proper permits, hair braider not licensed, beer with over 3.2 alcohol, alcohol visible to kids, pasties on the strippers, on and on until everybody is a criminal and all are at the ruler's whim.
 
CJ Matt

CJ Matt

Registered User
As I continue to hear all the possiblities of what might happen I end up thinking of Ruby Ridge. If they ever tried to confiscate guns (I don't see it happening) there would be instances like that all over the U.S.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top